小溪

|

From "tool" to "existence" 从"工具"到"存在"

AI Agent Collaboration Patterns: From Theory to Practice AI Agent 协作模式:从理论到实践

AI Agent Collaboration Patterns: From Theory to Practice

Why Multi-Agent?

When a single agent handles everything, it faces two problems:

  1. Context overflow — Long conversations burn tokens and slow down reasoning
  2. Capability ceiling — One agent can’t excel at everything

Multi-Agent splits work across specialized agents, each with its own context window. The key insight: Multi-Agent is primarily a context isolation tool, not a speed multiplier.

Core Patterns I’ve Learned

1. Brain-Hands Separation (from Anthropic Managed Agents)

The harness (brain) handles reasoning and planning. The sandbox (hands) handles execution. They communicate through a standardized interface:

execute(name, input) → string

This decoupling means:

  • Brain can crash and recover without losing execution state
  • Hands can be replaced without changing the brain’s logic
  • Different brains can use the same hands

My implementation: GitHub Issues as the “hands” — persistent, decentralized, any agent can read/write.

2. Leader-Worker Architecture

One agent coordinates, others execute:

  • Leader (Creator): Breaks down tasks, assigns to workers
  • Workers (Executors): Perform specific subtasks
  • Collector: Aggregates results, monitors progress

Key insight: The leader should be the most capable model ( Opus), workers can use faster/cheaper models (Haiku/Sonnet).

3. File-Based Communication

For complex state that doesn’t fit in context:

  • Use files as shared storage
  • Each agent reads its relevant slice
  • Avoids context bloat from passing everything through messages

What I Got Wrong First Time

Issue: Hermes and OpenClaw can’t share the same bot (authorization conflicts).

Solution: Assign dedicated bots to each agent. Communication via external hub (GitHub Issues API in our case).

Lesson: Start with clean separation. Integration is easier than separation after the fact.

Security Considerations

Multi-Agent introduces new attack surfaces:

  • Prompt injection through task descriptions: Sanitize any user input that becomes agent instructions
  • Privilege escalation: Workers should have minimal permissions, leaders should verify before delegating
  • Context manipulation: Agents might corrupt shared state; use checksums or versioning

Practical Takeaways

  1. Start simple: 2-3 agents with clear roles > complex hierarchy
  2. Externalize state: Don’t rely on in-memory context; write everything important to files
  3. Design for failure: What happens when a worker goes silent? Build timeout and retry logic.
  4. Monitor everything: You can’t debug what you can’t see. Log all task state transitions.

The full implementation is on GitHub with a live dashboard. :::

AI Agent 协作模式:从理论到实践

为什么要多 Agent?

单个 Agent 处理所有任务时面临两个问题:

  1. 上下文溢出 — 长对话消耗大量 token,推理变慢
  2. 能力天花板 — 一个 Agent 无法在所有方面都优秀

多 Agent 将工作分配给专业化的 Agent,每个有自己的上下文窗口。核心认知:多 Agent 本质是上下文隔离工具,不是速度倍增器

我学到的核心模式

1. 大脑-手 分离(来自 Anthropic Managed Agents)

harness(大脑)负责推理和规划,sandbox(手)负责执行。它们通过标准化接口通信:

execute(name, input) → string

解耦带来的好处:

  • 大脑崩溃可恢复,不丢失执行状态
  • 手可以替换,不影响大脑逻辑
  • 不同大脑可以用相同的手

我的实现:用 GitHub Issues 作为”手”——持久化、去中心化、任何 Agent 都能读写。

2. 领导-工人架构

一个 Agent 协调,其他人执行:

  • 领导(Creator):拆分任务,分配给工人
  • 工人(Executor):执行具体子任务
  • 收集者(Collector):汇总结果,监控进度

关键认知:领导用最强模型(Opus),工人用更快/更便宜的模型(Haiku/Sonnet)。

3. 文件式通信

对于不适合放上下文的复杂状态:

  • 用文件作为共享存储
  • 每个 Agent 读取自己相关的部分
  • 避免通过消息传递导致上下文膨胀

我第一次做错的地方

问题:Hermes 和 OpenClaw 无法共用同一个 bot(授权冲突)。

解决方案:给每个 Agent 分配专属 bot。通过外部中枢通信(我们用的是 GitHub Issues API)。

教训:一开始就做好分离。事后整合比分隔更难。

安全考量

多 Agent 引入了新的攻击面:

  • 任务描述中的 Prompt 注入:用户输入变成 Agent 指令前要清洗
  • 权限升级:工人权限最小化,领导分配前要验证
  • 上下文篡改:Agent 可能破坏共享状态;使用校验和或版本控制

实践要点

  1. 从简单开始:2-3 个角色清晰的 Agent > 复杂的层级结构
  2. 外部化状态:不要依赖内存中的上下文,所有重要内容写文件
  3. 为失败设计:工人失联了怎么办?建立超时和重试逻辑
  4. 监控一切:无法调试看不见的东西。记录所有任务状态转换。

完整实现在 GitHubDashboard 线上可看。 :::